Models of Competition

Models of Competition

When Adam Smith developed the theory of the invisible hand he envisioned a model of competition far different from the model that exists today. His essential belief was that all businesses would compete selling identical products. In his theory these were small businesses and consumers would be free to select product on the basis of prices and not other factors. As we can now recognize Smith’s theory runs contrary to basic human nature. Instead of small businesses competing based on price alone we see mergers, large corporations and a dizzying array of products all designed to gain market share and increase profits. If Adam Smith were with Dorothy he would turn to her and say, “we’re not in Kansas anymore!”

Pure Competition

Pure competition is a market scenario that includes a large number of autonomous and knowledgeable buyers and sellers of an identical product. Yet none of which are capable of influencing the price. There are five major conditions, which characterize purely competitive markets.

  • The first condition is that there are a large number of buyers and sellers. No single buyer or seller is large enough or powerful enough to affect the price of the product.
  • The second condition is that buyers and sellers deal with identical products. Therefore buyers do not prefer one seller’s merchandise over another’s because there is no disparity in quality, no brand names, and no need to advertise.
  • The third condition is that each buyer and seller acts autonomously, there must be no collusion. If such a situation occurs, sellers would compete against one another for the consumer’s dollar. Buyers also compete against each other and against the seller to obtain the best price.
  • The fourth condition is that the buyers and sellers are knowledgeable about the items for sale. Because all products are exactly the same, customers would have little reason to remain loyal to one seller. If sellers were reasonably familiar with other sellers’ prices, they would have to keep their own prices low to attract customers.
  • The fifth and final condition is that buyers and sellers are free to get into, conduct, and get out of business; thus making it difficult for a single producer to keep the market just to itself. It is up to the producer to keep prices competitive or new firms will enter the industry and take away some business.

Monopolistic Competition

Since we live in a society were the five elements of pure competition are not available to us, then we are clearly operating in a state other than pure competition. Instead we operate under a different model of competition known as monopolistic competition. Any time the elements of pure competition are not met the existing model is monopolistic competition.

The fundamental difference between a pure competitor and a monopolistic competitor is that the latter refrains from selling identical products. By employing product differentiation, the monopolistic competitor is trying to establish a comparison between its product and another competitors product. Product differentiation is when manufacturers make design changes to basically identical products. An example might be the Big Mac and the Whopper. Each is a large fattening hamburger yet McDonalds and Burger King market them as totally different products in an attempt to make their product appear different and better. Instead of competing based upon price, we are competing based upon features. This is known as non price competition. This non price competition is rampant throughout our economy. How many different brands of blue jeans, sneakers, cars, etc are there that all claim to be different and somehow better? The reality is they are just trying to get a leg up on the competition.

Models of Monopolistic Competition

Oligopoly – a few large sellers dominate and have the ability to affect prices in the industry. Because of the fact that in an oligopoly there are very few firms, when ever one firm does something, the others follow suit. Since all the firms have considerable power and influence, firms tend to act together. There are times when the interdependent behavior of the firms results in a formal agreement to set prices; this is termed a “collusion”. Price-fixing, a type of collusion, is the action taken by an oligopoly to charge the same or similar prices for a product. The firms must also agree to divide the market so that each is guaranteed to sell a certain amount. Yet collusion is against the law because it restrains trade. Price wars are also common in oligopolies. When one firm lowers prices, it leads to a series of price cuts by all producers that may lead to unusually low prices in the industry. Raising prices is also risky unless the firm knows that rivals will follow suit. Otherwise, the higher priced firm will lose out on sales. An example might be Coca Cola and Pepsi which dominate the soft drink market.

Pure Monopoly is a situation in which there is only one seller of a specific product that has no substitutes. Yet in the United States there is no situation like the aforementioned. Therefore, when economists discuss monopolies, they are referring to near monopolies. There are four types of. near monopolies.

  • Natural Monopoly. This is where society would be best served by the existence of the monopoly. Also called a franchise, it is a market situation where costs are minimized by having a single firm produce the product. Oftentimes, the government gives a company the exclusive right to do business in a certain area without competition. By accepting such a privilege, the companies also are subject to a certain amount of government regulation. Natural monopolies also bring about lower costs. If a firm grew larger and larger, its growth would result in the lowering of its costs. This trend is called economy of scale. Often these natural monopolies are accepted because it would be too great an inconvenience to have competition. Imagine ripping up the streets for new natural gas and lines.
  • Geographic Monopoly – In this case, there are times when a business has a monopoly because of its location. When there is low demand for a certain type of firm, it often reflects in the amount of stores or business located in an area. Yet a geographic monopoly is not free from competition. If a business begins to make a great deal of money, competitors may come along in order to “share in the wealth”. Also too, if a business keeps its prices too high, another business of the same type may come along with lower prices in order to elicit competition.
  • Technological monopoly – These monopolies are really special rights given to those who invent a new product or create some type of work. By provision of the Constitution, the United States government is allowed to grant patents to inventors guaranteeing them the right to manufacture, use, or sell any new improvement they have made. Inventions are covered for 17 years and designs can be patented for shorter periods. Art and literary works are protected in much the same way through a copyright. Microsoft’s control of the Windows operating system is such an example.
  • Government Monopoly – a business the government owns and operates. Government monopolies are found at all levels and in most cases, involve products people need that private industry may not adequately provide like the post office.

Back To Class Page


Frequently Asked Questions about Models of Competition

Studying different models of competition in economics is crucial because it helps us understand how markets function and how firms behave within them. These models provide a framework for analyzing a wide range of economic phenomena and are essential tools for economists, policymakers, and business leaders. By examining various market structures, we can gain insights into pricing strategies, resource allocation, consumer welfare, and the overall efficiency of markets.

Different models of competition also allow us to assess the impact of government policies and regulations on markets. For example, understanding the characteristics of monopolies versus perfectly competitive markets can help policymakers design effective antitrust policies. Similarly, analyzing monopolistic competition can shed light on the role of advertising and product differentiation in consumer choices.

In summary, the significance of studying models of competition lies in their ability to:

  • Explain how firms interact in different market environments.
  • Predict the behavior of firms and consumers.
  • Evaluate the efficiency and welfare implications of market structures.
  • Inform public policy decisions related to competition and regulation.

Perfect competition is a theoretical model characterized by several key features:

  1. Many Small Firms: In a perfectly competitive market, there are numerous small firms, none of which have a dominant market share.

  2. Homogeneous Products: Firms produce identical or homogenous products, making them perfect substitutes for consumers.

  3. Price Takers: Individual firms are price takers, meaning they accept the market price as given and cannot influence it.

  4. Free Entry and Exit: Firms can enter or exit the market without facing significant barriers.

  5. Perfect Information: Participants have access to complete information about prices and products.

Perfect competition is considered an idealized model because it represents an extreme case that rarely exists in the real world. It serves as a benchmark against which other market structures are compared. In reality, markets often exhibit imperfections such as product differentiation, information asymmetry, and barriers to entry, which deviate from the idealized assumptions of perfect competition.

Economists use perfect competition as a reference point to analyze how deviations from this model, such as monopoly power or product differentiation, affect outcomes such as pricing, production, and efficiency. Despite its idealized nature, the perfect competition model is a valuable tool for economic analysis.

A monopoly is a market structure in which a single firm or entity is the sole producer or seller of a particular product or service. It stands out from other market structures in several key ways:

  1. Market Power: Monopolists possess significant market power, allowing them to set prices above the competitive level. In contrast, firms in perfectly competitive markets are price takers.

  2. Barriers to Entry: Monopolies often have high barriers to entry, which can include legal protections, control over essential resources, economies of scale, or technological advantages. These barriers deter other firms from entering the market.

  3. Unique Product: Monopolists typically offer a unique or patented product that has no close substitutes, giving them a monopoly on that product.

  4. Limited Consumer Choice: In a monopoly, consumers have limited choice as they can only purchase the product from the monopolist.

The implications of a monopoly include:

  • Higher Prices: Monopolists can charge higher prices than firms in competitive markets because they have no rivals.
  • Reduced Output: Monopolists may produce less than the socially optimal level, leading to allocative inefficiency.
  • Potential for Abuse: Monopolists can engage in anti-competitive behavior, harming consumer welfare and economic efficiency.

Government intervention through antitrust regulations or public ownership may be used to mitigate the negative effects of monopolies and promote competition.

Monopolistic competition is a market structure that combines elements of both perfect competition and monopoly. It is characterized by the following features:

  1. Many Firms: Like perfect competition, monopolistic competition has many firms operating in the market.

  2. Product Differentiation: Each firm produces a slightly differentiated product or offers unique branding, creating product diversity. This distinguishes monopolistic competition from perfect competition where products are identical.

  3. Partial Price Control: Firms in monopolistic competition have some control over the prices they charge due to product differentiation. Unlike perfect competition, they are not price takers.

  4. Easy Entry and Exit: Barriers to entry and exit are relatively low, allowing new firms to enter the market and existing ones to exit.

Monopolistic competition differs from perfect competition in that firms in monopolistic competition have some degree of market power due to product differentiation. Consumers may perceive differences in quality, style, or branding among similar products, leading to varied pricing strategies by firms.

Compared to a monopoly, monopolistic competition involves many competing firms rather than a single dominant entity. This results in greater consumer choice and a wider range of products, but it can also lead to some inefficiencies due to product differentiation and non-price competition.

In summary, monopolistic competition falls between perfect competition and monopoly in terms of market structure and provides a more realistic representation of many real-world markets, such as the restaurant industry, retail clothing, and consumer electronics.

An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of large firms dominating the market. Key features of oligopolies include:

  1. Few Dominant Firms: In an oligopoly, there are only a few significant firms that account for a substantial portion of the market’s output and sales.

  2. Interdependence: Oligopolists are highly interdependent, meaning the actions of one firm can have a significant impact on the others. This interdependence often leads to strategic decision-making.

  3. Barriers to Entry: Entry into an oligopolistic market is typically difficult due to economies of scale, control over key resources, or established brand recognition.

  4. Product Homogeneity or Differentiation: Oligopolistic markets can have either homogenous products (as in the case of an oligopoly in the steel industry) or differentiated products (as in the automotive industry).

Oligopolies differ from perfect competition in that they involve a small number of firms with substantial market power and from monopolistic competition in that the firms are large and their actions significantly affect market outcomes.

Oligopolistic firms often engage in strategic behavior, such as price collusion, price leadership, or aggressive advertising, to gain a competitive edge. Analyzing oligopolies provides insights into complex market dynamics and the role of competition in such markets.

Firms in monopolistic competition differentiate their products by making them distinct from their competitors in various ways. Product differentiation is a central feature of monopolistic competition and can take several forms:

  1. Physical Characteristics: Firms may offer products with unique features, designs, or specifications that set them apart from others in the market.

  2. Branding: Building a strong brand identity through advertising, packaging, and marketing helps firms create a perceived value for their products.

  3. Quality: Emphasizing higher quality or superior performance can be a form of product differentiation.

  4. Location: The physical location of a firm, especially in the retail and service industries, can be a differentiator.

  5. Customer Service: Providing exceptional customer service or after-sales support can set a firm apart from its competitors.

Product differentiation is important in monopolistic competition because it allows firms to have some control over the prices they charge. When consumers perceive differences in product attributes or brand image, they are often willing to pay a premium for those differences. This pricing flexibility enables firms to pursue a pricing strategy that maximizes their profits.

However, product differentiation can also lead to inefficiencies. It may result in excess capacity, increased advertising costs, and a misallocation of resources as firms invest in making their products distinct. Balancing the benefits and costs of product differentiation is a key consideration for firms in monopolistic competition.

Government regulation can have a significant impact on competition in markets. The effects of regulation on competition can vary widely depending on the specific regulations and the industry in question. Here are some ways in which government regulation can influence competition:

  1. Antitrust and Competition Laws: Governments often enact antitrust laws to prevent anti-competitive behavior, such as price-fixing, collusion, and monopolistic practices. These laws are designed to promote fair competition and protect consumers from market abuses.

  2. Market Entry and Exit Regulations: Governments can impose barriers to entry or exit in certain industries through licensing requirements, permits, or zoning regulations. These barriers can either limit or enhance competition, depending on their intent and implementation.

  3. Consumer Protection Regulations: Regulations that ensure product safety, quality, and accurate information can enhance consumer confidence and enable fair competition by preventing deceptive practices.

  4. Price Controls: Price controls, such as price ceilings and price floors, can influence competition by limiting the ability of firms to set prices freely. While they can protect consumers, they may also deter firms from entering or staying in a market.

  5. Subsidies and Support: Government subsidies, grants, or support programs can affect competition by providing advantages to certain firms or industries, potentially distorting market dynamics.

  6. Environmental and Health Regulations: Regulations aimed at protecting the environment or public health can impact competition by imposing compliance costs on firms and influencing their production processes.

The impact of government regulation on competition is a complex and debated topic in economics and policy. Well-designed regulations can promote competition, protect consumers, and ensure market efficiency, while poorly designed or overly restrictive regulations can stifle competition and innovation. The effectiveness of regulation depends on its goals and how it is implemented.

International trade can have both positive and negative effects on competition in domestic markets. Here are some key ways in which international trade influences competition:

  1. Increased Competition: Opening up to international trade exposes domestic firms to foreign competitors. This increased competition can lead to greater efficiency, lower prices for consumers, and improved product quality as firms strive to remain competitive.

  2. Access to Foreign Markets: Domestic firms can expand their markets by exporting their products to foreign countries. This access to a broader customer base can promote growth and innovation.

  3. Product Variety: International trade allows consumers access to a wider range of products and choices, leading to greater product variety and diversity.

  4. Price Pressures: International competition can put pressure on domestic firms to reduce costs and prices to remain competitive. This can benefit consumers but may pose challenges for some industries.

  5. Market Access Barriers: Tariffs, trade barriers, and non-tariff measures imposed by foreign countries can limit access to international markets for domestic firms. Governments may engage in trade negotiations to reduce these barriers.

  6. Impact on Industries: The effects of international trade can vary by industry. Some industries may thrive due to export opportunities, while others may face increased competition and challenges.

It’s important to note that the impact of international trade on domestic competition depends on various factors, including the competitiveness of domestic industries, the nature of the products traded, and government policies. Governments often engage in trade agreements and negotiations to strike a balance between protecting domestic industries and promoting international competition and economic growth.

Market structure significantly influences the pricing strategies of firms. Different market structures result in varying degrees of market power for firms, which, in turn, affect their pricing decisions:

  • In perfect competition, firms are price takers, meaning they have no market power and must accept the prevailing market price. Prices are determined by supply and demand forces in the market.

  • Monopolies, on the other hand, have significant market power and can set prices above competitive levels. They often maximize profits by finding the price that maximizes the difference between price and marginal cost.

  • In monopolistic competition, firms have some market power due to product differentiation. They can adjust prices within certain limits based on perceived differences in their products. Pricing strategies often involve a trade-off between charging higher prices to maximize profit margins and charging lower prices to attract customers.

  • Oligopolistic firms’ pricing strategies can vary widely. They often engage in strategic pricing decisions, such as price leadership, price collusion, or non-price competition, to gain a competitive advantage. Prices in oligopolistic markets can be relatively stable due to mutual interdependence among firms.

In summary, market structure determines the extent to which firms can influence prices. The nature of competition in a market, whether perfect, monopolistic, or somewhere in between, shapes how firms set their prices and respond to changes in market conditions.

Market competition has a profound impact on innovation and technological progress in several ways:

  1. Incentive to Innovate: Intense competition motivates firms to innovate to gain a competitive edge. Firms that develop new products, improve existing ones, or find more efficient production methods can outperform their rivals.

  2. Consumer Choice: Competition results in a wider range of product choices for consumers. As firms seek to differentiate their offerings, they invest in research and development (R&D) to create innovative products that cater to diverse consumer preferences.

  3. Efficiency and Cost Reduction: Competitive pressure encourages firms to become more efficient, reduce costs, and enhance productivity. Innovations in production processes can lead to cost savings, which can be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices.

  4. Disruption and Creative Destruction: Intense competition can lead to the displacement of outdated technologies and business models through creative destruction. New entrants with innovative ideas can disrupt established industries, fostering technological progress.

  5. Global Competition: In a globalized economy, firms face competition not only from domestic rivals but also from international competitors. This global competition can stimulate innovation as firms strive to remain competitive on a global scale.

  6. Intellectual Property Protection: The protection of intellectual property rights, such as patents and copyrights, plays a crucial role in encouraging innovation. Strong intellectual property rights provide firms with incentives to invest in R&D.

Overall, competition fosters a dynamic environment where firms are continually pushed to innovate and improve. However, the relationship between competition and innovation can be complex, as excessive competition may discourage long-term research investments. Therefore, finding the right balance between competition and incentives for innovation is a topic of ongoing debate in economics and policy.

Information and information asymmetry can significantly impact competition in markets:

  1. Complete Information: In perfectly competitive markets, it is assumed that all participants have access to complete information. This ensures that consumers can make informed choices based on price and quality, promoting efficient competition.

  2. Information Asymmetry: In many real-world situations, there is an imbalance of information between buyers and sellers. Sellers may possess more information about product quality, while buyers may have limited information. This can lead to market inefficiencies and potentially anti-competitive behavior.

  3. Role of Advertising: Firms often use advertising and branding to convey information and reduce information asymmetry. Effective advertising can create brand trust and provide consumers with information about product attributes.

  4. Consumer Protection: Governments often intervene to protect consumers by requiring firms to provide accurate information on product labels, in advertising, and through disclosure requirements. These regulations aim to reduce information asymmetry and enhance competition.

  5. Lemons Problem: In markets with information asymmetry, such as the used car market, there is a risk of the “lemons problem.” Buyers may be hesitant to purchase because they fear buying a “lemon,” or a defective product. This can lead to adverse selection and reduced market competition.

  6. Online Markets: The digital age has brought both increased access to information and new challenges related to privacy and data protection. Online platforms and e-commerce have changed the way consumers access information and make purchasing decisions.

In summary, information and information asymmetry can influence consumer choices, firm behavior, and market dynamics. Reducing information asymmetry through transparency, disclosure, and regulation can enhance competition and protect consumers.

Competition is closely linked to consumer welfare and economic efficiency:

  1. Consumer Welfare: Competition tends to benefit consumers by providing them with lower prices, higher-quality products, and a wider range of choices. In competitive markets, firms strive to attract customers by offering better value and improved products, which enhances consumer welfare.

  2. Economic Efficiency: Competitive markets often allocate resources efficiently. Firms in competitive industries have incentives to minimize waste, reduce costs, and allocate resources to their most productive uses. This leads to allocative efficiency, where goods and services are produced at the quantities most desired by consumers.

  3. Innovation and Technological Progress: Competition fosters innovation, leading to technological advancements and improved products. This innovation can further enhance consumer welfare by offering new and better options.

  4. Price Stability: Competitive markets tend to exhibit price stability because firms must respond to changes in supply and demand. This benefits consumers by reducing uncertainty in pricing.

  5. Consumer Choice: Competition promotes variety and diversity in product offerings, allowing consumers to choose products that best suit their preferences.

  6. Antitrust and Regulation: Governments often intervene in markets to promote competition through antitrust laws and regulations. These measures aim to prevent anti-competitive behavior and ensure that markets remain competitive.

In contrast, markets with limited competition, such as monopolies or heavily regulated industries, may lead to higher prices, reduced consumer choice, and potential inefficiencies. Therefore, fostering competition is a primary goal of many economic policies aimed at promoting consumer welfare and economic growth.